Widely known balances () are the Cheating Dilemmas Survey (IDQ; Buss ainsi que al

When it comes to dimension off close jealousy, on the 40 thinking-report tool was basically advertised just like the creation of the Worry about-Declaration and Projective Jealousy Scales (Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979). Of many tool were utilized only when. , 1992) intended to evaluate sex differences; the new Multidimensional Jealousy Measure (Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989) developed to measure the about three proportions of envy (intellectual, mental and you can behavioural dimensions); the fresh Myspace Jealousy Scale (Muise, Christofides, & Des) intended for researching the probability of an event that causes attitude out-of jealousy participants pertaining to the activity to your Fb; the latest Envy Level (Buunk, 1997), accustomed see three sorts of jealousy (activated, stressed and precautionary) in addition to Social Envy Measure (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), and therefore evaluates this new bad feelings as a consequence of genuine or endangered loss away from a loved individual a rival.

When you look at the Brazil, this new Close Jealousy Collection was changed (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) In terms of Colombia, there are not any psychometric education from a particular level with the close jealousy

Throughout the Latin click to read american perspective, there is certainly a type in the Chile of your own Catalog off Behavior of your Partners That cause Envy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). In Mexico, a Multidimensional Measure of Jealousy (Diaz-Loving, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) could have been elaborated and you may a primary research are completed with the Multidimensional Catalog of Romantic Jealousy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). At the same time, previous degree don’t would Factorial Confirmatory Research (CFA) to be able to corroborate the latest factor build discover, and you may low reliability account was basically used in their situations (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) or small trials were used (Mota mais aussi al., 2016).

The new IJS set up to have Mathes and Severa (1981) is one of the most put balances to have evaluating personal envy, they receive half dozen facts that assess the awareness so you’re able to threats associated to: (a) Partner’s infidelity and relationship other people (activities step 1, step 3, a dozen, 14, fifteen, sixteen, 20, twenty-two, 23, and twenty five); (b) Lover’s prominence (factors 2, 3, cuatro, seven, ten, 13, 17, 20, and you can 23); (c) An untrustworthy partner (activities 1, cuatro, 6, 19, and 21); (d) Lover’s dated schedules (activities eleven, 24, twenty-six, twenty-seven, and you can twenty-eight); (e) Partner’s apathy (points 8, 9 and you can twenty four); and you will (f) Partner’s leftover members of the family having old dates and intercourse distinctions (factors 5 and you can 18).

Every instruments in the list above have shown enough degrees of validity and you will reliability

There are four training which have checked-out with regards to their accuracy and you can validity. Mathes and you may Severa (1981) expose several knowledge, plus the basic research performed the construction of level that have 39 issues, which was faster so you can twenty eight items immediately after mathematical analysis. Subsequently, into the another investigation, IJS was applied next to almost every other balances you to evaluated romantic like-links, insecurity, self-regard and a random questionnaire from separate identities, verifying, centered on principle, that the higher level away from jealousy, the higher the degree of Close love in addition to cheaper the new independent name of couple. Within analysis, i report a good coefficient out-of reliability of .ninety-five into the overall scale. Inside a 3rd data, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you will Knob (1982), in order to extend the new symptoms away from validity, used the IJS and two behavioural methods: (a) risk whenever confronted with a rival and you will (b) phrases of possessiveness toward companion, compliment of a mobile call that they made to the person who participated in the research. New questioned correlations was basically obtained, and that once more offered the newest authenticity of level. In the long run, within the a fourth research, Mathes, Roter and you may Joerger (1982) substantiated the newest convergent validity of IJS together with other balances you to examined romantic jealousy.

Scroll to Top